ПОСТАНОВЛЕНИЕ Европейского суда по правам человека от 17.11.2005<ДЕЛО МИХАЙЛОВА И ДРУГИЕ (mikhaylova and others) ПРОТИВ РОССИИ> [англ.]

for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants (see, in a similar context, Poznakhirina, cited above, § 35).
B. Costs and expenses
42. The applicants also claimed each RUR 2,000 for the costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.
43. The Government considered that the documents submitted by the applicants lacked evidence that the applicants had incurred any costs.
44. According to the Court"s case-law, an applicant is entitled to reimbursement of his costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum. In the present case, regard being had to the information in its possession and the above criteria, the Court considers it reasonable to award each applicant the sum of EUR 20 in respect of costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable.
C. Default interest
45. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Declares the application admissible;
2. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention;
3. Holds that there is no need to examine the third applicant"s complaint under Article 13 of the Convention;
4. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, the following amounts:
(i) EUR 80 (eighty euros) to the first applicant, EUR 60 (sixty euros) to the second applicant, EUR 100 (one hundred euros) to the third applicant and EUR 95 (ninety-five euros) to the fourth applicant in respect of pecuniary damage, to be converted into the national currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(ii) EUR 20 (twenty euros) to each of the applicants in respect of costs and expenses, to be converted into the national currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(iii) any tax that may be chargeable on the above amounts;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
5. Holds that the finding of a violation constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage sustained by the applicants;
6. Dismisses the remainder of the applicants" claim for just satisfaction.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 17 November 2005, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Christos ROZAKIS
President
Santiago QUESADA
Deputy Registrar

[рус., англ.](по состоянию на 31.12.2004) "><СТАТУС КОНВЕНЦИИ n 122 МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЙ ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ ТРУДА "О ПОЛИТИКЕ В ОБЛАСТИ ЗАНЯТОСТИ" (ЖЕНЕВА, 9 ИЮЛЯ 1964 ГОДА)> [рус., англ.](по состоянию на 31.12.2004)  »
Международное законодательство »
Читайте также